Skip to content

General Dynamics Corp. v. Scharpf

Pending petition

Docket No. Op. BelowArgument Opinion Vote Author Term
25-293 4th Cir. TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD

Issue: Whether plaintiffs adequately plead that defendants engaged in fraudulent concealment, for purposes of tolling the 15 U.S.C. § 15b (Clayton Act) statute of limitations, by alleging that defendants maintained an unwritten agreement.

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
09/11/2025Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 15, 2025)
09/23/2025Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 15, 2025 to November 14, 2025, submitted to The Clerk.
09/25/2025Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 14, 2025.
10/15/2025Brief amicus curiae of Shipbuilders Council of America filed.
10/15/2025Brief amici curiae of United States Chamber of Commerce, et al. filed.
10/30/2025Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 14, 2025 to November 21, 2025, submitted to The Clerk.
10/31/2025Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including November 21, 2025.
11/21/2025Brief of respondent Susan Scharpf in opposition filed.
12/09/2025Reply of petitioners General Dynamics Corp., et al. filed. (Distributed)
12/10/2025DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/9/2026.
01/12/2026The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.