Hamm v. Sockwell
Application for stay of mandate denied on Oct. 8, 2025.
Issue: Whether the Supreme Court should stay the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit's mandate instructing the district court to issue a writ of habeas corpus.
| Date | Proceedings and Orders |
|---|---|
| 09/25/2025 | Application (25A347) for a stay, submitted to Justice Thomas. |
| 09/26/2025 | Order entered by Justice Thomas: Upon consideration of the application for the applicant, it is ordered that the mandate of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, case No. 23-13321, is hereby stayed pending further order of the undersigned or of the Court. It is further ordered that a response to the application be filed on or before Friday, October 3, 2025, by 4 p.m. (EDT). |
| 10/03/2025 | Response to application from respondent Michael Sockwell filed. |
| 10/06/2025 | Reply of applicant John Hamm filed. |
| 10/08/2025 | Application (25A347) referred to the Court. |
| 10/08/2025 | Application (25A347) for stay presented to Justice Thomas and by him referred to the Court is denied. The denial is without prejudice to a reapplication if a new trial is imminent. See Calderon v. Moore, 518 U. S. 149 (1996) (per curiam); Garrison v. Hudson, 468 U. S. 1301 (1984) (Burger, C. J., in chambers). The order heretofore entered by Justice Thomas is vacated. |